spacer
 
 

Bookmark and Share



dividerPrinter FriendlydividerPage Information
The Second District of North Carolina

Home to rural communities, small towns, and established cities, the district features the best that North Carolina has to offer. This is illustrated by the fact it is home to  the State Capital, growing industrial and technical centers, a solid agricultural economy, a strong military presence, and prestigious institutions of higher education.

It is my goal to represent the values of the Second District in the US House of Representatives. We are now at a point in history, where simply maintaining the status quo isn't good enough. A change is needed to ensure the citizens of this district need to have their rights protected and voices heard.  

The Second Congressional District is located in the eastern-central region of the state. In recent years, the district has experienced a rapid population growth; it is now predominantly suburban with a population exceeding 674,000 people. It includes all or part of the following counties: Chatham, Lee, Harnett, Cumberland, Sampson, Johnston, Nash, Franklin, Vance, and Wake

We have a lot going for us, but we also have some serious challenges as well. Like the rest of our country, we are suffering from misguided policies established by politicians in Washington, DC. One of these career politicians is Bob Etheridge who has held office for nearly 14 years. While I have great respect for his position and him personally, it is apparent that he has lost touch with his constituents and we need a representative who will not cater to special interests at the expense of North Carolina's citizens.

Congressman Etheridge has consistently sided with the Democratic leadership at the expense of North Carolinians and even his own Democratic base; his record shows a pattern of supporting irresponsible spending and taxation, eroding our liberties, supporting unconstitutional initiatives, punishing the middle class and working poor, and serving corporate interests. We need to remedy that situation now! With strong support by special interest groups and the gerrymandering by his party at the state level, this will be a challenge but it has been done before. He can be replaced again by a candidate representing your interests; but it will be a team effort and I'm asking for your support in that endeavor.


Second District Map

  District map overlay courtesy of Govtrack.us    

 

As you may note on the map above, the second district is oddly shaped.  This is a direct result of 'gerrymandering' - the Democratic party carved up counties to form districts could easily be carried by their party. Concentrations of conservatives, constitutionalists, and Republicans were spread across multiple districts to ensure they would be unlikely to win key races. In this process, you have politicians choosing their voters rather than voters choosing their representatives. This is a trend that cannot continue. In addition to asking for your support with my campaign, I'm asking that you support conservative candidates at the state level; with the upcoming census, they will be in a position to fairly adjust district boundaries during the upcoming term.

Please consider contributing or volunteering in support of a limited, Constitutional government; free enterprise, and individual liberty. Simply hosting a private gathering in your home or business can make a difference. We can sit down and discuss the challenges and solutions to the hurdles we face. By discussing these matters, I can ensure I understand your needs and we can work towards finding the best solutions to the problems we face. Let's talk now and take back Our House Again in 2010! 
 

About the District

North Carolina's Second District includes all or part of the following counties: Chatham, Lee, Harnett, Cumberland, Sampson, Johnston, Nash, Franklin, Vance, and Wake. This includes the following communities: Angier, Bailey, Benson, Bonnetsville, Broadway, Buies Creek, Bunn, Cary, Castalia, Centerville, Clayton, Clinton, Coats, Delway, Dortches, Dunn, Erwin, Faison, Fayetteville, Fort Bragg, Four Oaks, Franklinton, Garland, Garner, Goldston, Harrells, Henderson, Ingold, Ivanhoe, Keener, Kenly, Kittrell, Lillington, Louisburg, Micro, Middlesex, Momeyer, Nashville, Newton Grove, Pine Level, Pittsboro, Pope AFB, Princeton, Raleigh, Red Oak, Rocky Mount, Roseboro, Sanford, Selma, Siler City, Smithfield, South Henderson, Spring Hope, Spring Lake, Turkey, West Smithfield, Whitakers, Willson's Mills, Youngsville, and Zebulon.

This district is privileged to house Fort Bragg and Pope Air Force Base as well as the men and women in uniform who serve at these posts.

The region also hosts a number of leading academic institutions including Campbell University, Central Carolina Community College, Fayetteville State University, Johnston Community College, Louisburg College, North Carolina Wesleyan College, Methodist College, North Carolina State University, Sampson Community College, Shaw University and Vance-Granville Community College.


Fast Facts

Social Characteristics

Estimate

Percent

U.S.

Average household size

2.68

(X)

2.61

Average family size

3.25

(X)

3.20

Population 25 years and over

442,950

 

 

High school graduate or higher

(X)

79.9

84.5%

Bachelor's degree or higher

(X)

17.7

27.4%

Veterans (civilian population 18 years and over)

60,414

11.9

10.1%

Foreign born

57,968

8.1

12.5%

Male, Now married, except separated (population 15 years and over)

136,055

49.1

52.2%

Female, Now married, except separated (population 15 years and over)

132,685

47.2

48.2%

Speak a language other than English at home (population 5 years and over)

75,817

11.5

19.6%

Household population

674,317

 

 

 

 

 

 

Economic Characteristics 

Estimate

Percent

U.S.

In labor force (population 16 years and over)

362,263

66.0

65.2%

Mean travel time to work in minutes (workers 16 years and over)

25.6

(X)

25.3

Median household income (in 2008 inflation-adjusted dollars)

42,945

(X)

52,175

Median family income (in 2008 inflation-adjusted dollars)

52,147

(X)

63,211

Per capita income (in 2008 inflation-adjusted dollars)

20,394

(X)

27,466

Families below poverty level

(X)

12.4

9.6%

Individuals below poverty level

(X)

16.2

13.2%

 

 

 

 

Housing Characteristics 

Estimate

Percent

U.S.

Total housing units

284,695

 

 

Occupied housing units

251,764

88.4

88.0%

Owner-occupied housing units

164,562

65.4

67.1%

Renter-occupied housing units

87,202

34.6

32.9%

Vacant housing units

32,931

11.6

12.0%

Owner-occupied homes

164,562

 

 

Median value (dollars)

120,700

(X)

192,400

Median of selected monthly owner costs

 

 

 

With a mortgage (dollars)

1,145

(X)

1,508

Not mortgaged (dollars)

339

(X)

425

 

 

 

 

ACS Demographic Estimates

Estimate

Percent

U.S.

Total population

712,841

 

 

Male

356,138

50.0

49.3%

Female

356,703

50.0

50.7%

Median age (years)

33.3

(X)

36.7

Under 5 years

54,533

7.7

6.9%

18 years and over

529,373

74.3

75.5%

65 years and over

69,962

9.8

12.6%

One race

698,254

98.0

97.8%

White

436,590

61.2

74.3%

Black or African American

204,608

28.7

12.3%

American Indian and Alaska Native

3,236

0.5

0.8%

Asian

7,798

1.1

4.4%

Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

576

0.1

0.1%

Some other race

45,446

6.4

5.8%

Two or more races

14,587

2.0

2.2%

Hispanic or Latino (of any race)

76,708

10.8

15.1%

OCCUPATION

Civilian employed population 16 years and over

313,852

+/-4,763

313,852

Management, professional, and related occupations

90,829

+/-2,799

28.9%

Service occupations

50,730

+/-2,285

16.2%

Sales and office occupations

75,327

+/-2,872

24.0%

Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations

5,176

+/-998

1.6%

Construction, extraction, maintenance and repair occupations

42,087

+/-2,176

13.4%

Production, transportation, and material moving occupations

49,703

+/-2,735

15.8%

 

INDUSTRY

Civilian employed population 16 years and over

313,852

+/-4,763

313,852

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining

8,285

+/-1,035

2.6%

Construction

34,229

+/-2,041

10.9%

Manufacturing

45,230

+/-2,664

14.4%

Wholesale trade

9,059

+/-1,029

2.9%

Retail trade

39,770

+/-2,348

12.7%

Transportation and warehousing, and utilities

13,992

+/-1,089

4.5%

Information

5,083

+/-839

1.6%

Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing

14,574

+/-1,133

4.6%

Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative and waste management services

22,056

+/-1,247

7.0%

Educational services, and health care and social assistance

65,404

+/-2,731

20.8%

Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accommodation, and food services

22,174

+/-1,779

7.1%

Other services, except public administration

15,410

+/-1,266

4.9%

Public administration

18,586

+/-1,375

5.9%

 

CLASS OF WORKER

Civilian employed population 16 years and over

313,852

+/-4,763

313,852

Private wage and salary workers

241,477

+/-4,459

76.9%

Government workers

54,417

+/-2,634

17.3%

Self-employed workers in own not incorporated business

17,312

+/-1,271

5.5%

Unpaid family workers

646

+/-250

0.2%

 

INCOME AND BENEFITS (IN 2008 INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS)

Total households

251,764

+/-2,701

251,764

Less than $10,000

23,795

+/-1,366

9.5%

$10,000 to $14,999

16,696

+/-1,179

6.6%

$15,000 to $24,999

30,493

+/-1,482

12.1%

$25,000 to $34,999

31,639

+/-1,627

12.6%

$35,000 to $49,999

40,855

+/-1,688

16.2%

$50,000 to $74,999

49,000

+/-1,993

19.5%

$75,000 to $99,999

28,908

+/-1,377

11.5%

$100,000 to $149,999

22,557

+/-1,338

9.0%

$150,000 to $199,999

4,624

+/-659

1.8%

$200,000 or more

3,197

+/-505

1.3%

Median household income (dollars)

42,945

+/-807

(X)

Mean household income (dollars)

53,637

+/-738

(X)


Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-2008 American Community Survey

Explanation of Symbols:
'***' - The median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.
'*****' - The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.
'N' - Data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.
'(X)' - The value is not applicable or not available.